Home
What is
Hepatitis
How is it
Transmitted
Long Term
Prognosis
Complications of
HCV
Liver
Biopsy
Treatment Info
(Interferon, Herbal, etc)
Lab Tests (PCR,
Genotype,etc.)
Nutrition
& Alternative Info
Patient
Information (Support Groups, Doctor Listing,
etc)
Related
Webpages
Transplant
Info
Site
Search
HCV
Webrings
My
guestbookbook
Site
Awards
FAQ &
Disclaimers
|
DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE TO TREATMENT WITH CONSENSUS INTERFERON
(CIFN) AND IFN [alpha]-2b IN CHRONIC HCV PATIENTS INFECTED WITH
DIFFERENT HCV SEROTYPES
E Keeffe, LM Blatt, G Dusheiko, MJ Tong, FB Hollinger, S
James, K Mullen, G Everson, N Pimstone, EJL Heathcote, J Donovan, A
Conrad, P Schmid, D Albert, T Gerrard and the Consensus Interferon
Study Group Standford University, Palo Alto, CA, Amgen Inc.,
Boulder, CO and the CIFN study sites
Chronic HCV patients infected with genotype 1 have been shown to
be more difficult to treat with IFN [alpha]-2b than those infected
with other genotypes. Although the genotype assay yields important
information, it is difficult to perform and expensive to use. In
order to assess the utility of using the less expensive and easier
to use serotype assay, we determined the HCV serotype and genotype
of 704 patients who were enrolled in the Phase 3 CIFN pivotal
study. In this study, patients with chronic HCV infection were
randomized to receive CIFN at doses of 3 or 9 µg or IFN
[alpha]-2b at a dose of 15 µg (3 MU) three times weekly (TIW)
for 24 weeks followed by 24 weeks of observation. HCV serotype was
determined using the Murex synthetic peptide assay and genotype was
determined using the Inno-Lippa assay. There was a high level of
correspondence between genotype and serotype for genotypes and
serotypes 1, 2, and 3 (rho=0.93, P < 0.001). There was a
significant difference in the HCV RNA response rates (by RT-PCR)
among serotypes. Patients infected with serotypes 2 and 3 had
higher HCV RNA response rates than patients infected with serotype
1 (P < 0.001 at end of treatment and at end of posttreatment
observation). This difference was independent of treatment group
and follows the same pattern observed for the analysis of HCV RNA
response by HCV genotype. Comparison of HCV RNA response by
serotype for the three treatment groups at the end of the treatment
period revealed a statistically significant greater number of HCV
RNA responders for serotype 1 patients treated with 9 µg CIFN
(29%) as compared with serotype 1 patients treated with 15 µg
IFN [alpha]-2b (14%) (P=0.003). By the end of the posttreatment
observation period, 9% of serotype 1 patients who were treated with
9 µg CIFN had a durable HCV RNA response as compared with 4%
of serotype 1 patients who were treated with 15 µg IFN
[alpha]-2b. These data demonstrate the utility of HCV serotyping
and suggest that CIFN may be a more effective therapy than IFN
[alpha]-2b for treatment of chronic HCV patients infected with
serotype 1.
This research was funded by Amgen Inc., Boulder, CO.
Source: American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
- 1996 Annual Meeting
Home | What is HCV | Transmission |
Future |
Complications |
Biopsy |
Treatment
| Lab |
Nutrition |
Patient |
Links | Transplant |
Webrings |
guestbookbook |
Awards |
FAQ
|
|